Unnat Technologies Talk to us
Technologies
Overview & comparison Ultra-WidebandRFIDmmWave Radar
Industries
All industries Sport & Athlete PerformanceManufacturingWarehousing & LogisticsYards, Ports & FleetHealthcareConstruction & MiningRetail & InventorySmart Buildings
Company
Capabilities About Contact Talk to us

Home/Industries/Warehousing & Logistics

Industry

Every forklift, every pallet, every dock door.

Location inside the building, identity at the doors, and occupancy in the aisles — the three questions a distribution centre asks all day.

UWB · LeadsRFID · LeadsmmWave · Supports
The problem

What is actually hard here.

A misplaced pallet is not lost — it is somewhere in the building, and finding it costs someone the better part of a shift. The cost is not the pallet; it is how often it happens and how invisible it is in any report.

Dock doors are where the expensive errors are made. A pallet on the wrong trailer is discovered at the far end of a journey, and the cost of the correction is out of all proportion to the cost of catching it at the door.

Meanwhile nobody has a reliable picture of congestion. Which aisles jam, when, and whether the slotting plan is the reason.

The shape of a deployment

What it looks like on site.

Forklift, liveRacking aisles · anchors aboveDashed line: the forklift path over the last minuteDock 1Dock 2Dock 3RFID portalsmmWaveaisle occupancy,no tag neededWhat it answersWhere is truck 13'spallet?Which aisle iscongested, and when?Did dock 2 load theright SKUs?
A warehouse is the clearest case for using all three. Anchors over the aisles, RFID portals at the docks, radar where you want occupancy without issuing anything to anyone.
What gets measured

The outputs worth having.

  • Forklift position and route — continuously, including the reversing and waiting that never appears in a WMS.
  • Pallet and tote location — where a unit was put down, not where it was supposed to be.
  • Dock-door verification — what went on which trailer, confirmed by read order and direction.
  • Pick-path efficiency — actual distance walked or driven per line picked.
  • Aisle occupancy and congestion — from radar, with no tag on anyone.
  • Near-miss mapping — where people and vehicles come close, plotted rather than reported.
Technology choice

Why these, and not the others.

UWB for anything that moves continuously and matters between scans: forklifts, tugs, high-value totes.

RFID at the choke points, which in a warehouse are numerous and well-defined. Dock doors, conveyor exits, put-away confirmation.

mmWave for the questions about people that should not require issuing people anything: aisle occupancy, pedestrian flow, crossing points.

Getting there

A sensible order of work.

  1. Start at the docksRFID portals have the shortest path to a number the operation already argues about.
  2. Then the vehiclesA dozen UWB tags on forklifts is a small tag estate with a large amount of insight in it.
  3. Anchors above the rackingMounted high, surveyed properly, with geometry planned for aisles rather than open floor.
  4. Radar where people areCrossings, aisle ends, pedestrian routes.
  5. Into the WMSLocation and read events joined to the inventory record, not kept in a separate dashboard nobody opens.
What changes

If it works.

  • “Where is it?” becomes a query rather than a search.
  • Mis-ships are caught at the door rather than at the customer.
  • Slotting and layout decisions get made from measured travel instead of intuition.

Does this look like your site?

Tell us the space, what moves in it, and the decision a position would change. We will tell you which technology fits and what a first deployment would involve.