Unnat Technologies Talk to us
Technologies
Overview & comparison Ultra-WidebandRFIDmmWave Radar
Industries
All industries Sport & Athlete PerformanceManufacturingWarehousing & LogisticsYards, Ports & FleetHealthcareConstruction & MiningRetail & InventorySmart Buildings
Company
Capabilities About Contact Talk to us

Home/Technologies

Technologies

Three radios that answer three different questions.

Ultra-wideband tells you where something is. RFID tells you what passed a point. mmWave tells you whether anyone is there. Confusing these is the most expensive mistake in a sensing project.

The comparison

Side by side.

Figures below are typical of the technology in normal conditions, not guarantees for a particular site. Real numbers come out of a site survey, and they are usually worse than a datasheet and better than a sceptic expects.

What each technology actually delivers
Ultra-wideband RFID (passive UHF) mmWave radar
Gives you An x, y and often z coordinate, continuously Identity, timestamp and direction at a read point Presence, count, motion and micro-motion in a zone
Typical resolution Tens of centimetres Zone or portal — no coordinate Sub-metre in range; coarser in angle
Does the target carry anything? Yes — a powered tag Yes — a battery-free tag No
Tag cost High, and each one has a battery to manage Very low; effectively unlimited life Not applicable
Infrastructure A surveyed anchor grid across the whole covered space Readers and antennas at choke points only One sensor per zone of interest
Identity Yes, per tag Yes, per item No — and that is often the point
Main enemy Blocked line of sight and poor anchor geometry Metal, liquid and tag orientation Clutter, occlusion and multi-target separation
Indian band 1.6–10.6 GHz, very low power · GSR 1046(E) 865–867 MHz · GSR 564(E) 76–77 GHz short-range radar · GSR 699(E)
Positioning

What you pay for resolution is infrastructure.

The three technologies are not competing points on one scale. They sit in different places on two axes at once — how finely they resolve space, and how much has to be installed to get it.

ZoneMetreDecimetreResolutionSparse infrastructureDense infrastructureReaders at choke pointsOne sensor per zoneFour-plus anchors per spaceRFIDIdentity where a reader is.No coordinate.mmWavePresence and count,no tag at all.UWBA coordinate, 10–30 cm,tag required.
UWBRFIDmmWave
Resolution against infrastructure density. Moving up the vertical axis always costs something on the horizontal one. The useful question is not “which is best” but “which rung of the vertical axis does this decision actually need”.
In practice

Most deployments need two of the three.

The combinations recur because the gaps are complementary. A few that come up constantly:

UWBRFID

Position plus identity

UWB follows the carrier — a trolley, a pallet, a fixture. RFID reads what is on it at each station. Tagging every item with a powered tag would be absurd; tagging the carrier is not.

UWBmmWave

Tagged assets, untagged people

Equipment gets a tag because equipment does not object. People often should not have to carry anything — patients, shoppers, visitors. mmWave covers them without issuing a thing.

RFIDmmWave

Cheap coverage, no tags on people

Readers at the doors answer “what came in”. Sensors in the aisles answer “is anyone there”. Together they cover a retail floor with no anchor grid at all.

Start with a site, not a specification.

Send us the space, what moves in it, and the accuracy the decision actually needs. We will tell you which of the three technologies fits, which does not, and what a first deployment would involve.